whythawk ratings: measuring effective development

NOTE: To use the advanced features of this site you need javascript turned on.

home arrow aloft: the whythawk blog
About Module

Did you know that emerging markets are lucrative investments?

 

Ask Whythawk.

Announce Module
Learn more Introduction to Unlocking the Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question

...

By: Cho on 22 July 2007

I agree that Zimbabwe has survived due to remittances and informality.  
 
However, I question your conclusion that "No government should ever get rid of its informal economy, even if it were possible.It is a wonderful tool for understanding the true desires of the people living within that state." 
 
I think there are significant benefits for moving towards greater formality - formal firms are more productive than informal firms and formality brings revenue to Government. There's a huge literature on this.

 

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

»  Go back to the article