whythawk ratings: measuring effective development

NOTE: To use the advanced features of this site you need javascript turned on.

home arrow aloft: the whythawk blog arrow What do toilet paper and state monopolies have in common?
About Module

Did you know that emerging markets are lucrative investments?

 

Ask Whythawk.

Announce Module
Learn more Introduction to Unlocking the Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid
What do toilet paper and state monopolies have in common?
 

By Gavin Chait, on 18 January 2007

You'll miss it if it's not there
You'll miss it if it's not there
Imagine a product so important that it requires special treatment.  Supply considered so essential by the state that it must be guaranteed through the creation of state-owned monopolies.  State monopolies so autocratic that no competitive products are allowed?  What products would you consider that important?  

The South African government has quite a list:  fuel, electricity, education, telecommunications, transport, and information (amongst others).

Sure, there are private petrol, education, transport and telecommunications companies, but that is just icing.  The core components, without which the rest cannot operate, belong to the state.

Many countries consider these types of products worthy of controlling.  Does it serve the public?

Witness the furore in Germany when Russia cut off their gas supplies during a dispute with Belarus.  Eskom, the South African state energy supplier, is suffering the indignity of demand that is “higher than was anticipated for this period," according to the company's managing director for transmission, Jacob Marog.  

Only state-owned monopolies can talk like that.  Private companies discuss the unprecedented demand for their products and the opportunity for growth.

Apple's iPod sales increased by 50% compared with the same period a year ago.  Tim Cook, Apple's chief operating officer said: "iPod demand was extraordinary," over the recent festive season.  Their new iPhone is to run on US-based Cingular’s telecommunications network.  Apple would be very surprised if Cingular capped the amount of bandwidth their subscribers could use and, in so doing, prevented them from downloading songs from Apple iTunes.

Yet this is precisely what Telkom, the South African state telecommunications monopoly does.  They cap bandwidth.  They cap telephone bills.  They cap lines.

Reuters, the media and information group, which has been expanding in countries such as India, is not investing in South Africa.  CEO Tom Glocer said his company was reluctant to do the same in SA because of Telkom’s high prices and poor bandwidth.

This is the real cost of state monopolies.  Not only isn’t there enough of the product that was considered so important in the first place.  But you’re unable to find any other supply.

A single supplier of anything is like having a single supplier of toilet paper.  You’ll only notice the problem when you most need it and, by then, it’s far too late.

   
Quote this article in website
Related articles

Keywords : monopoly, shortages


Users' Comments  
 


Add your comment
Name
E-mail
Title  
Comment
 
Available characters: 600
   Notify me of follow-up comments
  This image contains scrambled text in order to prevent spam.  If you have difficulty reading it then hit the Reload button next to the image.
Enter the characters in the image (case-sensitive):

   
   

No comment posted

< Prev   Next >