Which market offers a safe investment...

innovation in business and market risk analysis

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
prev
next

What we do

News image

Whythawk specialises in business and market risk analysis. We design systems to measure the interactions of the players in any economic system, and the potential future impact of those interactions.  We then guide clients in aligning the implementation of their strategy with their objectives.

Comparisons are essential for Strategy and Risk Management

News image

Whythawk believes in an unbiased approach to data analysis.  Our unique ratings methodology – the Bue System – is designed to allow rapid, consistent and objective comparisons of large and complex data sets against a chosen benchmark.

Forecasting is the basis for Investment and Planning

News image

Whythawk believes in an unbiased approach to data forecasting.  Our unique methodology – the Adi System – is designed to allow rapid, consistent and objective forecasting of both qualitative and quantitative data as well as direct scenario-planning and “what-if” analysis.

Consulting is the partnership of Information and Ideas

News image

Whythawk believes in an unbiased approach to consulting.  Our analytical systems for comparison and forecasting allow us to analyse the efficiency of our client’s strategy implementation. We then guide clients in aligning their systems with their original objectives.

Visual Data Comparison

The Whythawk Bue Risk Analysis System

  • allows rapid, visual comparisons and shows emerging trends;
  • saves time in complex data analysis;
  • expandable and adjustable for individual needs.

DownloadDownload a sample program here

http://www.whythawk.com/images/stories/measuring_apple.jpg

Rating to create a market; questions and answers

Until you measure it, you don't know
The Whythawk team is going through an exciting period of growth; rolling out enterprise development ratings in Gauteng, and developing a new model for rating HIV/AIDS organisations, is pushing us hard.

We have also been on an informal road-show introducing our concept to various organisations.  A presentation yesterday amongst a wide range of interest groups was a welcome reminder of how far we have come.  The team is so immersed in our work that we take a lot of the information for granted.  It is only once we come to explain it to others that we are reminded again of how much we have learned and the differences between the development and commercial sectors.

No matter what you buy for yourself there are always choices and options.  Analysts, journalists, and bloggers vie for your attention to communicate their opinions on everything from watches, to doctors, to movies and microwave ovens.  You can get contrarian opinions on health food versus junk food.

The development sector is a massive no-go area. 

Who says that the products and services offered by NGOs and charities are any good?  You can give anything away, but that doesn’t make it useful.  Charities themselves experience this when they go on donation drives.  Old clothes are donated that are so far beyond use that the charities are left worse off, since they have to now have the added expense of carting the stuff to the dump.  If well-meaning individuals can be so short-sighted that they don’t realise that their “gifts” are of no use, why should we take it for granted that the organisations themselves are any better?

As in everything in life, we would expect a diversity of approaches and results; some outstanding and innovative, some depressing and destructive, and everything in-between.

Outside measurement allows a harmonisation and collected endeavour.  Sprinters are timed over the same course to see whose ideas of training and strategy are best; computers are measured against each other running benchmark software to see which delivers best results; consultants compare return-on-equity measures to see who delivers better profits.  The purpose is not to compare approaches, or define the mechanisms by which these results are delivered, but to analyse the final results achieved in an objective and uniform way.

Poverty only becomes entrenched when you genuinely don’t care what you give away to those less well-off than yourself.  That is what entrenches poverty.

If you consider the poor a market worthy of competitive services then we can find the most effective and efficient way of bridging that divide.
 

Contradiction: when bad systems ruin good people

ProbabilityWherever large groups of people are managed in order to produce a product, serve a customer, or achieve some other strategic goal, management systems govern their interactions.

All these rules seem sensible at the time they are written, but the net impact is small inefficiencies that degrade the whole.

The game of Contradiction shows just how easily even simple interactions, which are poorly aligned, can result in irrational results.


DownloadDownload the rules of the game here.